Seitz v. Ryan et al
| John William Seitz |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2014cv00087 |
| January 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 . IT IS ORDERED that petitioner John Seitz's Motion Requesting Status of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 20 ) is denied as moot given the issuance of this Order. IT IS FURT HER ORDERED that petitioner John Seitz's [Amended] Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 7 ) is denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not issue and that the petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal of the amended habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar andjurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 06/02/15. (ATD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
