Sifford v. Serenity Hospice and Palliative Care et al
| Cheryl Sifford |
| Serenity Hospice and Palliative Care, Harvey Nevins, Shawn McAffee, Scott Mancuso and Ruth Siegel |
| United States of America |
| 2:2014cv00225 |
| February 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Stipulation of Dismissal. ORDERED HEREBY ORDERED 1) That the Amended Complaint, the Notice of Election to Intervene, the Stipulation of Dismissal, and this Order of Dismissal shall be unsealed. 2) All other papers or orders previously filed in this matter shall remain under seal. 3) The seal shall be lifted on all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this Order of Dismissal. 4) This action is dismissed, with prejudice as to the Covered Conduct described in the parties' settlement agreement and without prejudice as to any other claims, subject to the terms of the settlement between the parties. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/6/15. (MAP)
|
| Filing 13 EX PARTE STIPULATION of Dismissal by United States of America. (MAP) |
| Filing 12 EX PARTE NOTICE of Election to Intervene by United States of America. (MAP) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Serenity Hospice and Palliative Care, Ruth Siegel filed by Cheryl Sifford.(MAP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
