Freels v. Arizona City Sanitary District

Plaintiff: John Freels
Defendant: Arizona City Sanitary District
Case Number: 2:2014cv00271
Filed: February 12, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 12, 2014 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION, the motion to dismiss is granted; Plaintiff's state law claims, specifically Count One and the portion of Count Two that relies on the Arizona Constitution, are dismissed. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 5/12/14.(REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freels v. Arizona City Sanitary District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona City Sanitary District
Represented By: Asha Sebastian
Represented By: Jeffrey Charles Matura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Freels
Represented By: Carrie Ann Donnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?