Grindley #76966 v. Ryan et al
Kenneth Clyde Grindley |
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2014cv00363 |
February 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Michelle H Burns (PS) |
David G Campbell |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER - Magistrate Judge Burn's 20 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted by the Court. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and dismissed with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealab ility and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable and the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/30/2015. (ATD) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting 2 Petitioner's APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1 ) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respo ndents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/7/14. (LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.