Bottom Line Recoveries LLC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
| Bottom Line Recoveries LLC |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| 2:2014cv00443 |
| March 5, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 30 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Claim for Relief (Unjust Enrichment) of Complaint. (See attached Order). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/4/2014.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER - The parties wishing to present their request for a protective order to the Court, ORDERED setting In-Court Hearing on the parties' request for a protective order for 8/28/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 503, 401 West Washington Street, Pho enix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge James A Teilborg. Counsel for both parties shall appear in person; no telephonic appearances will be permitted. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall on or before 8/26/2014 jointly e-mail to the Court a brief, no t to exceed ten (10) pages that (1) describes the documents or groups in a way such that the Court can understnad why they deserve protection and (2) as to each document or group of documents, articulates the specific harm or prejudice that will result if a protective order is not granted. In addition, the parties may include legal argument as necessary. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/22/2014. (TLB)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER - On May 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The Court finds the amended complaint alleges subject matter jurisdiction. As a result, the Court will take no further action regarding jurisdiction without prejudice to Defendant raisin g any jurisdictional issue it deems appropriate. As a result of the amended complaint having been filed, ORDERED that the 16 Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims is denied without prejudice as moot. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint within 20 days. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/6/2014.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that by May 7, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the complaint properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/22/2014. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
