Arizona Board of Regents v. Seattle Genetics Incorporated

Defendant: Seattle Genetics Incorporated
Plaintiff: Arizona Board of Regents
Counter_claimant: Seattle Genetics Incorporated
Counter_defendant: Arizona Board of Regents
Case Number: 2:2014cv00653
Filed: March 31, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 4, 2015 444 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that SeaGen's Response to ASUs Supplemental Statement of Facts (Docs. 398 (redacted) and 416 (sealed)) is stricken as not authorized by the Rules of Practice of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Seattle Genetics, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 256 (redacted), 310 (sealed)) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that ASU's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docs. 293 (redacted), 299 (sealed)) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining pending motions in this case are denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that Seattle Genetics' Counterclaim (Doc. 10 ) is dismissed as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff and that Plaintiff take nothing. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 8/4/2015.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arizona Board of Regents v. Seattle Genetics Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seattle Genetics Incorporated
Represented By: John E DeWulf(Designation Retained)
Represented By: James George Gilliland, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Meyer
Represented By: Susan Marie Spaeth
Represented By: Jennifer Amy Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arizona Board of Regents
Represented By: William W Adolfsen(Designation Retained)
Represented By: C Mark Kittredge(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Kenneth Reed Willis(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Seattle Genetics Incorporated
Represented By: John E DeWulf(Designation Retained)
Represented By: James George Gilliland, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Meyer
Represented By: Susan Marie Spaeth
Represented By: Jennifer Amy Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Arizona Board of Regents
Represented By: William W Adolfsen(Designation Retained)
Represented By: C Mark Kittredge(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Kenneth Reed Willis(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?