Delgado v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
| Anthony Delgado |
| R Sanders, Marlene Coffy, Kieth Smith and Arizona Department of Corrections |
| 2:2014cv00665 |
| March 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Yuma |
| Steven P Logan (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER : Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 4 is granted; Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $23.80; The Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a cla im. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order; If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a j udgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner; Plaintiff's "Motion to Amend" 3 is denied without prejudice; All future filings must be captioned: CV 14-0665-PHX-DGC (MHB); the Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/19/2014. (ALS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
