CIT Finance LLC v. Treon, Aguirre, Newman & Norris PA
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 20, 2015
ORDER denying 19 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Join Indispensable Parties. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/20/2015.(TLB)
|May 2, 2014
ORDER - The Court has reviewed the two supplements to the complaint and finds jurisdiction to have been alleged. Accordingly, the Court will take no further action regarding jurisdiction at this time. This Order is without prejudice to Defendant raising any jurisdictional issue it deems appropriate. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify this Court within 24 hours if it discovers that any of its jurisdictional allegations were incorrect. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/2/2014. (TLB)
|April 29, 2014
ORDER - Plaintiff has not alleged the citizenship of the professional association Defendant. More specifically, Defendant must allege whether it is a partnership, and if yes, the citizenship of each of the partners. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that b y 5/13/2014, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the complaint properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/29/2014. (TLB)
|April 22, 2014
ORDER - Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the complaint by 5/7/2014 properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/22/2014. (TLB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?