DocRx Incorporated v. DocRx Dispense Incorporated
Plaintiff: DocRx Incorporated
Defendant: DocRx Dispense Incorporated and Martin V Olson
Case Number: 2:2014cv00815
Filed: April 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 31 Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Related Non-Taxable Expenses. The motion is granted to the extent that plaintiff DocRx, Inc. is awarded the sum of $29,539.90 for its attorneys' fees and the sum of $174.79 for its non-taxable expenses, for a total award of $29,714.69 from defendants DocRx Dispense, Inc. and Martin V. Olson, jointly and severally. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/28/2015.(LMR)
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 DEFAULT JUDGMENT OPINION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER: Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is granted in part and denied in part to the extent that plaintiff DocRX, Inc. seeks the entry of a permanent injunction and an award of its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, and is denied to the extent that the plaintiff seeks an award of damages. Permanent injunctive relief is entered against defendants Martin V. Olson and DocRx Dispense, Inc. ORDERED that d efendant Martin V. Olson shall file with the Court and serve on plaintiff DocRx, Inc.'s counsel within thirty (30) days after being mailed a copy of this Order and the Court's Judgment, a report in writing, under oath, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with the terms of the Court's injunction. Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve a copy on defendants, a motion for attorneys' fees and a bill of costs no later than fourteen (14) days after the entry of the Court's Judgment in this action. Plaintiff shall use reasonable efforts to serve a copy of this Order and the Court's Judgment on defendants and shall file a notice of such service with the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff Doc.Rx, Inc. accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 4/20/2015.(LFIG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DocRx Incorporated v. DocRx Dispense Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DocRx Incorporated
Represented By: Joseph G Adams
Represented By: Joy Lisanne Isaacs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DocRx Dispense Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin V Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?