Rue v. Hickman's Egg Ranch Incorporated
Plaintiff:
April Rue
Defendant:
Hickman's Egg Ranch Incorporated
Case Number:
2:2014cv00867
Filed:
April 23, 2014
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
Maricopa
Presiding Judge:
G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit:
Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:
42:12101
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
February 12, 2016 | 53 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rue v. Hickman's Egg Ranch Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: April Rue | |
Represented By: | John Lester Collins |
Represented By: | Trey A R Dayes, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hickman's Egg Ranch Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Susanne Elizabeth Ingold |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.