Wood et al v. Ryan et al
Plaintiff: |
Joseph Rudolph Wood, III, Graham S Henry, David Gulbrandson, Todd Smith, Charles M Hedlund and Eldon Schurz |
Defendant: |
Charles L Ryan, Ron Credio, Lance Hetmer and Unknown Parties |
Case Number: |
2:2014cv01447 |
Filed: |
June 26, 2014 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Office: |
Phoenix Division Office |
County: |
Pinal |
Presiding Judge: |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Presiding Judge: |
Neil V Wake |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 10, 2016 |
Filing
137
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Final Judgment as to Claims 3 and 4. (Doc. 125 .) See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/10/16. (NKS)
|
May 18, 2016 |
Filing
117
ORDER that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 98 ) is granted with prejudice as to the following claims in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint: Claim 1 (in part): First Amendment right to know efficacy of midazolam. Claim 2: Substantive due process claim against use of paralytic. Claims 3 and 4: First Amendment claims to information about the execution. Claim 5: First Amendment right of access to courts. Claim 8: Class of one equal protection violation. FURTHER ORDERED that Defenda nts' motion to dismiss (Doc. 98 ) is denied as to the following claims in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint: Claim 1 (in part): Eighth Amendment claim as to midazolam and paralytic. Claim 6: Eighth Amendment claim for failure to follow protocol. Claim 7: Procedural due process claim for failure to follow protocol. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Inc., is dismissed from this action with prejudice, as any amendment would be futile. FURTHER ORDER ED that Plaintiffs' unopposed request for judicial notice of the 1992 General Election Arizona Publicity Pamphlet (Doc. 100 ) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED: (1) that Defendants shall file an answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint no later than Friday, 05/27/16. (2) that initial disclosures shall be served no later than Wednesday, 06/08/16. (3) that the parties shall file a joint proposed Discovery Plan pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) no later than Friday, 06/24/16. (4) that a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 is set for Wednesday, 06/29/16, at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 504, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/18/16. (NKS)
|
July 10, 2014 |
Filing
21
ORDER that Plaintiff Wood's Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 11 ) is DENIED. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 7/10/14. (NKS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?