Humphreys & Partners Architects LP v. Atlantic Development & Investments Incorporated et al
| Humphreys & Partners Architects LP |
| Atlantic Development & Investments Incorporated, Auburn Ventures LP, Auburn Developers LLC, PWN Architects and Planners Incorporated, Patrick William Nook, Regis Construction Incorporated and Mark D Breen |
| 2:2014cv01514 |
| July 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John J Tuchi |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff Humphreys & Partners Architects, LP's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 113 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff Humphreys & Partners Architects, LP's Motion to Strike (Doc. 127 ). (See attached Order for complete details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/27/16.(JAMA) Modified on 4/27/2016 to add Written Opinion (WO) (JAMA).
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER granting in part and denying in part HPA's 111 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim Counts for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Count I is dismissed with prejudice, but the Court denies the Motion with respect to Counts II, III and IV. HPA's 112 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim is denied. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 04/15/2016. (ATD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
