Folta #153847 v. Van Winkle et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 12, 2018
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants' Joint Motion Requesting Entry of Protective Order for Documents to be Produced regarding Defendant Burke (Doc. 172 ). The Protective Order as proposed shall issue. Counsel shall email to Chambers the Word version of the document no later than one business day from the filing of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED approving the redactions proposed on documents Bates stamped ADC 084-294. Defendants shall release the redacted documents to Plaintiff 's counsel in a manner consistent with the Courts Protective Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 177 ). (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 3/12/18. (SLQ)
|November 3, 2016
ORDER granting Plaintiff's November 1, 2016 Motion (Doc. 152 ) and directing the Clerk of Court to withdraw Plaintiff's "Motion: Injunctive Relief (TRO against CIU/SIG investigator Pruitt)" (Doc. 151 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 11/3/16. (KGM)
|July 28, 2016
ORDER denying in part and granting in part 111 Defendants Contreras and Burke's "Motion for Reconsideration of a Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order (DKT. 103 )." ORDERED affirming the Court's April 4, 2016 Order (Doc. 103 ), ex cept that Defendants may present for an in camera inspection proposed redactions of the following information from the documents required to be produced: (i) employees' first names and (ii) any other security-sensitive information, provided that the proposed redactions are made in such a way that they do not materially impede Plaintiff's ability to decipher relevant information contained in the documents. ORDERED that unless Defendants file an objection to the Order (Doc. 103 ) with the District Judge, Defendants shall produce for an in camera inspection an unredacted and a proposed redacted version of the documents no later than fourteen days after this Order is filed. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to strike Plaintiff's May 2, 2016 filing, docketed as "Response to Motion for Reconsideration" (Doc. 117 ). See document for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 7/27/16.(EJA)
|January 14, 2016
ORDER granting Defendants' "Motion to Extend the Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Service by Publication (Doc. 61)" (Doc. 65 ). FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Motion for Service by Publication as to Defen dant Richard Basso" (Doc. 61 ). FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants' "Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Defendant Basso's Home Address" (Doc. 67 ). Defendants shall file under seal the home address of Defendant Basso by J anuary 19, 2016. Upon receipt of the address, the Clerk of Court shall prepare and send to the U.S. Marshal a service packet for service of the Summons and Complaint upon Defendant Basso. The time for completing service is extended sixty days from th e date this Order is filed. FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants' "Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Filings (DKTS. 8, 9, 14, and 17)" (Doc. 75 ). The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the documents docketed as Document Nos. 8 , [9 ], 14 , and 17 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendants' "Motion to Strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 60)" (Doc. 64 ). FURTHER ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's "Motion to Compe l Production of Documents" (Doc. 76 ) as set forth herein. By February 16, 2016, counsel for Defendants shall produce any and all disciplinary history pertaining to Defendant CO II Burke. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that "Motion for Default Judgement [sic] Against Dustin Burke" (Doc. 62 ) is referred to the District Court Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 1/13/2016.(KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?