Wyble v. Fluidmaster Incorporated

Plaintiff: Rocky E Wyble
Defendant: Fluidmaster Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2014cv01826
Filed: August 16, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wyble v. Fluidmaster Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fluidmaster Incorporated
Represented By: Kimberly L Buffington(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Mark D Litvack(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rocky E Wyble
Represented By: Adam A Edwards(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Lawrence Deutsch(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Gregory F Coleman(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Shanon Jude Carson(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Glen Lawrence Abramson(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Barry Lance Entrekin(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Lisa Anne White(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?