Robledo #250767 v. Taylor et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 8, 2017
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the motion to vacate (Doc. 207 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to vacate (Doc. 208 ) is denied. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the petition for writ (Doc. 214 ) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/8/17.(MAW)
|February 27, 2017
ORDER granting 89 Defendant Taylor's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants, Plaintiff shall take nothing. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/24/17.(LSP)
|December 21, 2016
ORDER - The Magistrate Judge's 193 Report and Recommendation is REJECTED.Thus, Defendant's pending Motion for Summary Judgment will be decided based on Defendant's 89 Motion and 90 Supporting Statement of Facts, Plaintiff 39;s replacement 145 Response and 146 Supporting Statement of Facts, Defendant's 152 Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant's 153 Objection to Plaintiff's Statement of Facts and Suppleme ntal Statement of Facts, Defendant's 157 Sealed Exhibits to the Supplemental Statement of Facts, and Plaintiff's 198 Controverting Statement of Facts to Defendant's Supplemental Statement of Facts. FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's 168 Motion for an Extension of Time is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/21/2016. (ATD)
|August 19, 2016
ORDER denying 133 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/19/16.(KGM)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?