Dema v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
| Victor O Dema |
| Unknown Perez, Mesa, City of, Maureen Volling, Bobbie Harris, Kari Rusk, Connie Pyburn, Kelly Jares, Desiree Granillo, Amanda Jackson, Alisha Shumway, Kindra Portillo, Arizona Department of Economic Security, Unknown Standridge, John L Grassy and Brian Ishikawa |
| 2:2014cv01887 |
| August 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Bridget S Bade |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER that Plaintiff's 9 Motions to Reinstate Action and to Stay Action are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 1/6/2015.(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 is granted; Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amende d complaint by December 10, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, the complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint by December 10, 2014, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further order of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 11/10/2014. (ALS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
