Taylor v. Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters LLP et al
Plaintiff: Steven Taylor
Defendant: Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters LLP and Jeremy T Bergstrom
Case Number: 2:2014cv01982
Filed: September 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Pursuant to this court's order of December 18, 2014 (Doc. #8 ), IT IS ORDERED dismissing this action without prejudice under Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/22/2015. (KMG)
December 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., that this action shall be dismissed without further notice after January 9, 2015, unless before then Plaintiff has served Defendant with the Summons and Complaint and has filed with the Clerk of the Court proof thereof pursuant to Rule 4(l) or has shown good cause for the failure to timely serve. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/18/14. (JAMA)
November 3, 2014 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Jeremy T Bergstrom, Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters LLP. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
October 31, 2014 Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Steven Taylor. (Neeley, Kenneth)
October 31, 2014 Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Steven Taylor. (Neeley, Kenneth)
October 30, 2014 Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Steven Taylor. (Neeley, Kenneth)
October 30, 2014 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Steven Taylor. (Neeley, Kenneth)
September 9, 2014 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-10850620. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-14-01982-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
September 9, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-10850620 filed by Steven Taylor. (submitted by Kenneth Neeley) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Taylor
Represented By: Kenneth Lynn Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy T Bergstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?