Dudley #112183 v. Mooney et al
| Damian Dudley |
| Wayne Mooney, Arizona Department of Corrections and Arizona, State of |
| 2:2014cv02006 |
| September 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER - (1) The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 10 ) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 3.4 of the Local Rules and Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a third am ended complaint in compliance with this Order. (2) If Plaintiff fails to file a third amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (See document for full details). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 2/22/15. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting 5 Motion for a Case Number. The Request for Sanctions is denied. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/22/14.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
