Pianka v. De Rosa

Petitioner: Victor Pianka
Respondent: Charles De Rosa
Case Number: 2:2014cv02179
Filed: October 1, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2016 50 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER accepting 43 Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns's Report and Recommendation. The Petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1 ) is denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/19/16.(DXD)
February 29, 2016 41 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's motion for Ruling and denying 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 02/29/16.(GAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pianka v. De Rosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Victor Pianka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles De Rosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?