Coleman v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Coleman v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Coleman v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Petitioner:	Anthony William Coleman
Respondent:	Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number:	2:2014cv02434
Filed:	November 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Yuma
Presiding Judge:	Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 5, 2015	Filing 15 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13 ) is accepted and adopted by the Court. Petitioner's Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 5 ) is den ied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued and that the petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/04/2015. (REK)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 5, 2015

Filing 15 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13 ) is accepted and adopted by the Court. Petitioner's Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 5 ) is den ied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued and that the petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/04/2015. (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony William Coleman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?