Walker #102833 v. Ryan et al
| Sheldon Walker |
| Charles L Ryan, Mike Linderman, Unknown Vicklund, Stacey Crabtree, D Han and Ralph McLaughlin |
| 2:2014cv02554 |
| November 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER: The reference to the to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 17 ) and the screening of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. All other matters remain referred to the M agistrate Judge for disposition as appropriate. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 17 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall file Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint lodged at Doc. 18 . Plaintiff's claims in Counts One and Two are dismissed. Defendants Ryan, Vicklund, and Linderman must answer the First Amended Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rul es of Civil Procedure. Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 09/18/2015. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
