Sanguigni v. E*Trade Securties LLC

Plaintiff: Christopher Sanguigni
Defendant: E*Trade Securties LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv02576
Filed: November 21, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 09:0010
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 29, 2015 21 Opinion or Order of the Court AMENDED ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Vacate Award and Motion to Compel Defendant's Performance 9 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant's Cross-Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award 10 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Defendant's Motion to Strike 15 (see attached Order for details). Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/28/15. (MAW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanguigni v. E*Trade Securties LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Sanguigni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E*Trade Securties LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?