Pianka v. De Rosa et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 9, 2015
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Disqualification and En Banc Review (Doc. 7 ) is denied. Petitioner's Motion to Designate the Amended Petition a Writ of Audita Querela or Coram Nobis (Doc. 11 ) is denied. Petitioner's Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. 9 ) is denied as moot. Petitioner's Amended Petition (Doc. 10 ) is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing S ection 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/9/15.(KGM)
|March 17, 2015
ORDER, Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 2 is denied without prejudice; Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is dismissed with leave to amend; Petitioner has 30 days to file an amended petition; if Petitioner fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/16/15. (REW)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?