Origami Owl LLC v. Mayo et al
Origami Owl LLC |
Julie E Mayo and Ann L Mayo |
2:2015cv00110 |
January 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
David G Campbell |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 110 is granted; Plaintiff is awarded $8,250 in damages against Defendant Julie E. Mayo; Defendant Julie E. Mayo and her officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, as well as all p ersons who are in active concert with her, are permanently enjoined from infringing Plaintiff's copyrighted works; Defendant's motion for summary judgment 108 is denied; the Clerk is directed to enter judgment consistent with this order and terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/30/17. (REW) |
Filing 99 ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 93 is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/22/16.(REW) |
Filing 86 DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment 82 is granted in part and denied in part; default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant West Coast Charms on all claims; Plaintiff is awarded $357,869.67 against West Coast Charms; Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/11/16. (REW) |
Filing 57 ORDER denying 52 Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/7/2015.(DGC, nvo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.