Cohn #288721 v. Arizona, State of
Charles L Ryan |
Michael J Cohn |
Arizona, State of |
2:2015cv00267 |
February 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
Douglas L Rayes |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 53 ), is accepted. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Peti tion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Cou rt enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Doc. 10), with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/17/16. (KGM) |
Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is ordered denying 24 Petitioner's request for an order of special action/mandamus transferring [Petitioner] to home arrest pending resolution of this case. It is further ordered that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 30 is accepted. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/31/2015. (ACL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.