Thomas #029933 v. Wexford Medical et al
Plaintiff: Donnell Thomas
Defendant: Nwadiuto Jane Nwaohia
Case Number: 2:2015cv00394
Filed: November 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: The Court agrees with Judge Metcalf's analysis that dismissal should be without prejudice. IT IS ORDERED dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's cause of action in this matter and instructing the Clerk to close the matter. See document for further details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 11/30/2015. (REK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas #029933 v. Wexford Medical et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donnell Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nwadiuto Jane Nwaohia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?