Roosevelt Irrigation District v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Roosevelt Irrigation District v. United States of America

Roosevelt Irrigation District v. United States of America

Plaintiff:	Roosevelt Irrigation District
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2015cv00439
Filed:	March 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2409
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2019	Filing 267 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 264 Alter or Amend the Judgment. While the Court will not grant a new trial or amend its dismissal of Plaintiff's QTA claim as set forth in Order (Doc. 256 ), the Court hereby amends the Order (Doc. 256 ) to correct misstatements of fact as specified in this Order. The Clerk shall amend the Final Judgment (Doc. 257 ) to dismiss Count I of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 35 ) with prejudice and Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 35 ) without prejudice. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/25/19. (DXD)
June 11, 2019	Filing 256 ORDER granting Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 198 ). SRP's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 196 ) and RID's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 211 ) are denied as moot. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/10/19. (DXD)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2019

Filing 267 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 264 Alter or Amend the Judgment. While the Court will not grant a new trial or amend its dismissal of Plaintiff's QTA claim as set forth in Order (Doc. 256 ), the Court hereby amends the Order (Doc. 256 ) to correct misstatements of fact as specified in this Order. The Clerk shall amend the Final Judgment (Doc. 257 ) to dismiss Count I of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 35 ) with prejudice and Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 35 ) without prejudice. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/25/19. (DXD)

June 11, 2019

Filing 256 ORDER granting Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 198 ). SRP's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 196 ) and RID's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 211 ) are denied as moot. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/10/19. (DXD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roosevelt Irrigation District v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Irrigation District
Represented By:	John C Lemaster
Represented By:	Samuel Lee Lofland
Represented By:	Sheryl Ann Sweeney
Represented By:	Naomi Edens Thurston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?