Clayton v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 10, 2016
ORDER that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 12 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing. (Doc. 1 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, terminating this case. (Doc. 1.) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/9/2016. (KMG)
|April 27, 2015
ORDER Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1 ) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mai l pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 4/27/2015. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?