Steward v. USA

Steward v. USA

Petitioner:	Sean Christopher Steward
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	2:2015cv00578
Filed:	March 30, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Michelle H Burns
Presiding Judge:	James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2017	Filing 18 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent a ruling on a certificate of appealability might be required, a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/27/17.(LSP)
April 19, 2016	Filing 8 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6 ) is accepted and adopted. The Objections are overruled (Doc. 7 ). This case is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Go verning Section 2255 Proceedings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 04/18/16. (GAR)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2017

Filing 18 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent a ruling on a certificate of appealability might be required, a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/27/17.(LSP)

April 19, 2016

Filing 8 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6 ) is accepted and adopted. The Objections are overruled (Doc. 7 ). This case is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Go verning Section 2255 Proceedings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 04/18/16. (GAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steward v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	W Mark Conover(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Timothy Coughlin(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Shane Harrigan(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sean Christopher Steward
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?