Mada-Lastra v. Unknown Party

Petitioner: Rafael Mada-Lastra
Respondent: Unknown Party
Case Number: 2:2015cv00734
Filed: April 23, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Referring Judge: Eileen S Willett (PS)
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:1651
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 18, 2015 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 9 ) is granted. Petitioners Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. 5 ) and this case are dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner's pending Motions (Docs. 11 , 12 , and 13 ) are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 09/18/2015. (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mada-Lastra v. Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rafael Mada-Lastra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?