Pilgrim v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
| Robert Joseph Pilgrim |
| Arizona Department of Corrections, Maricopa County Superior Court, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Hensley |
| 2:2015cv00856 |
| May 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pima |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 32 - The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 14 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/25/16. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 14 Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Robert Joseph Pilgrim be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's pleadings entitled motion for an evidentiary hearing and motion for a determination of direct appeal (Docs. 29 , 31 ) be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 02/26/16. (GAR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
