Rojas #158837 v. Ryan et al
| Richard Rojas |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2015cv00933 |
| May 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John Z Boyle |
| John J Tuchi |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER: Petitioner's Objection 41 to Section IV of the Magistrate Judge's R&R 40 is sustained and the Objection to Section I is overruled. The remainder of the R&R 40 is adopted. Petitioner's First Amended Petition for a Writ of H abeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 1 is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability shall issue on the question of whether Petitioner's sentencing complied with the constitutional requirements set forth in Miller v. Alabama. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/17/2018. (REK)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 be GRANTED as to Ground One, and DENIED as to Grounds Two and Thre e. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this matter be remanded to the state court for a new sentencing hearing that comports with the principles set forth in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455(2012). This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The parties hall have 14 days from the date of service of a copy of this Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. Thereafter, the parties have 14 day s within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to timely file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the district court without further review . Failure to timely file objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order of judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 2/02/2018. (REK)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting the Report and Recommendation in this matter (Doc. 14 ); FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner's Motion to Stay Pending Exhaustion of State Court Remedies (Doc. 4 ); FURTHER ORDERED granting Respondents' request for st ay pending a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 135 S. Ct. 1546 (Doc. 11 ); IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the Supreme Court's issuance of a decision in Montgomery, the parties shall file a notice of the decision with this Court, whereupon the Court shall lift the stay. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/28/2016. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
