Coleman v. Home Health Resources Incorporated et al
| Norma Coleman |
| Home Health Resources Incorporated and Crossing: Hospice Care Incorporated |
| 2:2015cv01332 |
| July 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' request for award of attorney's fees on its discovery motion is granted in the amount of $3,840.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. [11 8]) is granted in the additional amount of $50,625.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment in favor of Defendants Home Health Resources, Inc. and The Crossing: Hospice Care, Inc. against Plaintiffs Norma Coleman and Booker Coleman, jointly and severally, in the amount of $54,465.00 plus interest at the federal rate of 2.24% per annum from the date of judgment until paid. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 5/11/18. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment and directing the Clerk enter judgment in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff and that Plaintiff take nothing. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 08/28/2017.(KAS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
