Guthery v. GoDaddy.com LLC et al
| Sebastian Guthery |
| GoDaddy.com LLC and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2015cv01803 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John J Tuchi |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER granting Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default (Doc. 40 ). FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant Mr. Allen's Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction With Notice (Doc. 51 ). FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Rule 7.2(I) Request for Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request that the Court set a Hearing for Plaintiff to Establish the Amount of his Monetary Damages (Doc. 36 ). FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff properly serve Mr. Allen via his attorney with the Summons and Amended Complaint. Upon proper service, Plaintiff shall file the Certificate of Service on the docket by June 14, 2016. FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Guthery may file a Reply in support of his Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 29 ) no later than June 16, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Preliminary Injunction hearing on July 1, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 505, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J. Tuchi. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/6/2016.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
