Carpenter Crest 401(k) PSP v. Converti et al

Plaintiff: Carpenter Crest 401(k) PSP
Defendant: Rebekah Converti, Unknown Converti and 2-Acorns Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2015cv02004
Filed: October 6, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15:78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 27, 2017 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The Judgment at Doc. 19 entered against the named Defendants is vacated. ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter full and final judgment in this matter as follows: (1) For the reasons provided by the Court in its Order at Doc. 18 , and pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk shall enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Rebekah Converti and The 2-Acorns, Inc. in the following amounts: (1) $350,000 in principa l; (2) $102,666.74, which represents 22 months of unpaid monthly interest payments; and (3) additional monthly interest payments of $4,666.67 until the principal amount of $350,000, plus all accrued interest, has been paid in full to Plaintiff. (2) Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing Defendant John Doe Converti with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. 21 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/27/17.(EJA)
March 2, 2017 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 17 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk shall enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and agai nst Defendants Rebekah Converti and The 2-Acorns, Inc. in the following amounts: (1) $350,000 in principal; (2) $102,666.74, which represents 22 months of unpaid monthly interest payments; and (3) additional monthly interest payments of $4,666.67 until the principal amount of $350,000, plus all accrued interest, has been paid in full to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/02/2017. (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carpenter Crest 401(k) PSP v. Converti et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rebekah Converti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Converti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 2-Acorns Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carpenter Crest 401(k) PSP
Represented By: Neal Hait Bookspan
Represented By: Douglas O Guffey
Represented By: Jeffrey A Silence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?