Nordstrom v. Ryan et al
Scott Douglas Nordstrom |
Charles Ryan, James O'Neil and Staci Fay |
2:2015cv02176 |
October 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
John Z Boyle (PS) |
David G Campbell |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 ORDER denying 117 Motion to Enforce the Settlement. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 10/1/2019. (RMV) |
Filing 112 ORDER that Mr. Garza's motion to reconsider 111 is denied. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 5/30/2019. (REK) |
Filing 110 ORDER - 1. The motions to enforce the settlement (Docs. 71 , 75 , 76 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 85 , 86 ) are denied. 2. The motions to cease and desist hindering third-party beneficiary's ability to file and serve plaintiff and defendant (Docs. 87 , 88 ) are denied. 3. The motions for an extension of time to file a reply (Docs. 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 ) are denied. 4. The motion for default judgment (Doc. 96 ) is denied. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 5/15/19. (LAD) |
Filing 72 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 64 Motion to Enforce. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/11/19. (CLB) |
Filing 59 ORDER granting in part 46 Plaintiff's motion for fees and expenses as set forth in this Order. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/2/18. (EJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.