Lowe v. Maxwell & Morgan PC
Michael Lowe |
Maxwell & Morgan PC |
2:2015cv02481 |
December 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Douglas L Rayes |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER denying Lowe's 42 Motion for Class Certification; and denying M&M's 49 Motion to Strike. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/19/2017. (MMO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lowe v. Maxwell & Morgan PC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Lowe | |
Represented By: | Francis Robert Connelly, II |
Represented By: | Jonathan Adam Dessaules |
Represented By: | Douglas Clark Wigley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Maxwell & Morgan PC | |
Represented By: | Tomio B Narita |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.