Altus Oak Financial Insurance Services Incorporated v. Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Altus Oak Financial Insurance Services Incorporated
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Case Number:
2:2016cv00152
Filed:
January 22, 2016
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:
18:1030
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Altus Oak Financial Insurance Services Incorporated v. Unknown Parties | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Altus Oak Financial Insurance Services Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Tanya L Forsheit |
| Represented By: | Kerry Matthew Griggs |
| Represented By: | Mathew Scott Koller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown Parties | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
