Di Donato v. Insys Therapeutics Incorporated et al
| Richard Di Donato |
| Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Michael L Babich, Darryl S Baker and John N Kapoor |
| 2:2016cv00302 |
| February 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Neil V Wake |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
271
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Further Opposition to Lead Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 170 ) is granted. The Clerk will file the sur-reply attached as Exhibit A to the motion (Doc. 170-1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Lead Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 159 ) is granted. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 9/20/2019. (SST)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 85 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, as summarized on pg. 39 of the attached Order. (See attached document for details.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice 81 is denied to the extent that Defendants ask the Court to take notice of the substantive content of filings in other judicial proceedings, but granted in all other respects. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/1/2017. (RMW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
