Arnold et al v. Standard Pacific of Arizona Incorporated et al
| Christine Arnold, Noel Caudillo, Nancy Nollola, Daisy Chyzy, Dominic Galaviz, Carlos Ochoa-Dardon, William Ochoa-Dardon and Nicole Turner |
| Standard Pacific of Arizona Incorporated, HSP Arizona Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2016cv00452 |
| February 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $24,193.65. Plaintiff's 34 motion to seal is granted. The Clerk is directed to accept for filing under seal the document lodged as Doc. 35 on the Court's docket. Defendant's 36 motion for leave to file a sur-reply is granted. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/02/2016. (ATD)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER - 1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19 ) is granted. The Court holds that Section VIII of the Warranty (Doc. 25 at 37-39) is unenforceable and that arbitration should proceed before the AAA in accordance with the ADR addendum (Doc. 25 at 26). 2. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/12/16. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
