Hunton v. American Zurich Insurance Company
| Bryan Hunton |
| American Zurich Insurance Company |
| 2:2016cv00539 |
| February 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
381
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 372 Motion to Stay. Defendant's motion to stay the Court's December 4, 2018 order during the pendency of the appeal is DENIED. Defendant's alternative motion for a 7-day stay is GRANTED. The Court's December 4, 2018 order (Doc. 369 ) is STAYED for a period of 7 days from the date of this order. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/30/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing
369
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Unseal Trial Exhibits (Doc. 366 ), which the Court construes as a motion for relief from the July 7, 2016 Protective Order's restrictions on the disclosure of confidential material produce d during discovery, is GRANTED. Exhibits publicly admitted into evidence by Plaintiff at trial (See Doc. 347 ) are no longer subject to the Protective Order's restrictions on the disclosure of confidential material, provided that all personal identifying information contained within the employee performance evaluations is redacted. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/3/18. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
282
ORDER - Zurich's motion for summary judgment (Docs. 223 , 240 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Hunton' 247 motion to strike is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk of the Court shall strike from the record Zurich's separate statement of controverting facts and accompanying exhibits (Docs. 246 , 252 ). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/6/2018. (ATD)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER granting 199 Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant shall, within seven (7) days from the date of this order, produce all communications between Brown and ICA counsel relating to the coverage determination and ultimate decision to approve Plaintiff's claim. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/29/2017. (MMO)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER denying 82 Motion to Dismiss Supplemental Complaint Re Lack of Jurisdiction. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/9/2017. (MMO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunton v. American Zurich Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Hunton | |
| Represented By: | Sander Ruggill Dawson |
| Represented By: | Steven C Dawson |
| Represented By: | Anita Rosenthal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Zurich Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Kelly Ann Hedberg |
| Represented By: | Steven G Mesaros |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
