Julian v. Swift Transportation Incorporated et al
| Pamela Julian |
| Swift Transportation Company Incorporated and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC |
| 2:2016cv00576 |
| March 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
288
ORDER granting 282 Motion for Approval of Settlement. ORDERED granting in part 283 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiffs' counsel are entitled to 25% of the Gross Settlement Amount plus reimbursement of actual out of pocket costs of $308,153.88. ORDERED granting in part 284 Motion for Service. Plaintiff Pamela Julian is entitled to a service award of $15,000 out of the Gross Settlement Amount. FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 10/13/20. (EJA)
|
|
Filing
279
ORDER re: 278 Report - Status: IT IS ORDERED no later than September 18, 2020, Plaintiffs shall file their motion for approval of the settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motions in Limine (Doc. 263 , 266 , 268 , 269 , 273 ) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 8/31/2020. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
246
ORDER denying 222 Motion to Require Plaintiffs Provide Travel Plan ; granting 223 Motion for Award of Damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a status conference is set for January 14, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than January 7, 2020, the parties shall file a joint status report listing the matters to be resolved at trial, the expected number of witnesses each side wishes to call, and the anticipated length of trial. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/27/19. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
245
ORDER denying 221 Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than January 10, 2020, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating the weeks both sides are available for trial from February 2020 through July 2020. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/10/19. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
220
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 213 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Stipulation to Request Re-Setting Pretrial Schedule 219 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the deadline for submission of pretrial documents i s VACATED to be reset by later order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than June 10, 2019, Swift shall file its motion regarding interlocutory appeal. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition no later than June 17, 2019, and Swift shall file its reply no later than June 24, 2019. See attachment for further details and deadlines. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 5/30/19. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
207
ORDER the Motion for Summary Judgment 157 and Motion for Extension of Time 190 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Summary Judgment 159 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than January 18, 2019, if Plaintiffs believe there are no genuine disputes of material fact regarding the first day of orientation and time spent studying, Plaintiffs shall file a motion for summary judgment addressing those two issues. The response and reply shall be submitted as required by Local Rule 56.1. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than February 1, 2019, the parties shall submit a joint statement addressing the other issues remaining in this suit. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/28/18. (CLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
