Lomingkit v. Apollo Education Group Incorporated et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 26, 2017
ORDER granting in part 88 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as described herein. The Clerk shall dismiss this case with prejudice and enter judgment accordingly. See Order for details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 7/26/17.(DXD)
|February 16, 2017
ORDER granting 63 Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice; denying 74 Defendants' Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice; denying 71 (at 3-4) Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice; granting 62 Defendants' Motion to D ismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint against Defendants within 21 days from the date of this Order. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this case with prejudice if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/16/17.(DXD)
|June 16, 2016
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that GGRFs Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Its Selection of Lead Counsel, (Doc. 34 ), is GRANTED. GGRF's selection of lead counsel is approved, and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP is ap pointment as lead counsel for the purported class. Tiffany & Bosco P.A. is appointed to serve as local counsel for lead plaintiff and the purported class. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Li, National Shopmen, and Iron Worker's competing motions for appointment as lead plaintiff and approval of lead counsel, (Docs. 30 , 31 , 33 ), are DENIED. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/16/16. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?