Starling v. Banner Health et al
| Mark Starling |
| Banner Health, Marjorie J Bessel, Julie Nunley, Cindy Helmich, Lori Davis-Hill and Joseph Chatham |
| 2:2016cv00708 |
| March 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
318
*AMENDED ORDER (to correct caption) - Amending Doc. 315 : Order re: 216 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Stan Smith, and 221 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Chester Flaxmayer. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Banner He alth's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Stan Smith 216 is granted regarding Smith's report and testimony on hedonic damages. The motion is otherwise denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Banner Health's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Chester Flaxmayer 221 is granted. Please see attached Order for additional information. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 2/21/2018. (RMW) Modified to add WO on 2/22/2018 (SLQ).
|
|
Filing
302
ORDER denying 301 Defendant Banner Health's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's January 12, 2018 Ruling. See attached Order for additional information. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 1/29/2018. (RMW)
|
|
Filing
296
ORDER - No claims remain against Bessel, Nunley, Helmich, or Davis-Hill. Only Starlings ADEA age discrimination and ADEA retaliatory discrimination case against Banner will proceed. A final pretrial conference will be set by separate order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Banner Health, Marjorie Bessel, M.D., Julie Nunley, Cindy Helmich, and Lori Davis-Hill's 218 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted regarding Counts III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, and XI and denied regarding Counts I and II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 243 Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) is denied. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 1/11/2018. (ATD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
