Merck v. Swift Transportation Company et al
| Lydia Merck |
| Swift Transportation Company, Central Refrigerated Service LLC, Robert Gary Parker and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2016cv01103 |
| April 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
ORDER the parties shall submit a third revised Joint Proposed Pretrial order no later than Thursday, September 27, 2018, at 9:00 A.M. in accordance with the instructions set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall submit revised Jury Instructions order no later than Thursday, September 27, 2018, at 9:00 A.M. in accordance with the instructions set forth above. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/26/18. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 177 Motion in Limine to Exclude Witness Larry Wagner, or any witness from One Beacon. Larry Wagner, or any witness from One Beacon, may testify regarding the One Beacon lien and the medi cal bills and figures included in that total, but may not offer testimony regarding the other subjects in Swift's motion, including the reasonableness of Plaintiff's medical expenses. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/19/18. (CLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
