Quiel v. USA
Petitioner: Michael Quiel
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2016cv01535
Filed: May 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 24 Petitioner's Amended Motion for Reconsideration. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/14/18. (LAD)
June 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Government must provide evidence that at least one attorney participating in the underlying criminal matter was a proper representative of the United States by Tuesday, July 3, 2018 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/26/18. (MAW)
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation, (Doc. 17 ), is ACCEPTED and Movant's objections, (Doc. 18 ), are OVERRULED; accordingly, Movant's amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 7 ; CR Doc. 474) is denied and dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly; Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied; A Certi ficate of Appealability is denied, because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see Slack v.McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 48384 (2000); IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Compel Government to Produce Documents, (Doc. 19), is DENIED. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/24/17. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?