Altela Incorporated v. Arizona Science and Technology Enterprises LLC et al
| Altela Incorporated |
| Arizona Science and Technology Enterprises LLC and Arizona State University Foundation for a New American University |
| 2:2016cv01762 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER - 1. AzTE's motion to dismiss and compel ADR (Doc. 22 ) is granted, insofar as it seeks to compel arbitration pursuant to subsection 1(f) of the ADR Addendum. The motion is denied insofar as it seeks to compel negotiation or mediation pur suant to subsections 1(a)-(d). 2. The Foundation's motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (Doc. 23) is granted, insofar as it seeks to compel arbitration pursuant to subsection 1(f) of the ADR Addendum. The motion is denied insofar as it seeks to compel negotiation or mediation pursuant to subsections 1(a)-(d). 3. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for August 31, 2016 at 4:00 pm. is vacated. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/31/16. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
