Grant v. USA
Petitioner: Steven Houston Grant
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2016cv02057
Filed: June 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Bridget S Bade
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Motion to Lift the Stay 19 is granted. The Report and Recommendation 22 is accepted, the Motion 1 is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINAL LY ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/10/2018. (REK)
October 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13 ) is rejected; that the Motion to Stay (Doc. 4 ) is granted; and that the Government must move to lift the stay within 5 days of Beckles v. United States, 616 Fed. Appx. 415 (11th Cir. 2015), cer t. granted, 136 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. June 27, 2016) (No. 15-8544) and Dimaya v. Lynch, 803 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2015) cert. granted, --- S. Ct. ----, 2016 WL 3232911 (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 15-1498) being decided by the Supreme Court (subject to any further orders issued by the Magistrate Judge). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/31/16.(KGM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?