Flores-Angeles v. USA

Flores-Angeles v. USA

Petitioner:	Abraham Flores-Angeles
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	2:2016cv02067
Filed:	June 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Bridget S Bade (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 21, 2020	Filing 26 ORDER adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court 25 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 1 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating Movant's conviction and sentence as to Count Three. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that re-sentencing will be set for Counts One, Two and Four. See document for further details. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/21/2020. (REK)
February 10, 2017	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court (Doc. 19 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Respondent/Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Further Proceed ings on the Motion to Vacate Sentence (Doc. 12 ). This matter is stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Lynch v. Dimaya, No. 15-1498 and the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. Begay, No. 14-10080. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/10/17. (KGM)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 21, 2020

Filing 26 ORDER adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court 25 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 1 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating Movant's conviction and sentence as to Count Three. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that re-sentencing will be set for Counts One, Two and Four. See document for further details. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/21/2020. (REK)

February 10, 2017

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court (Doc. 19 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Respondent/Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Further Proceed ings on the Motion to Vacate Sentence (Doc. 12 ). This matter is stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Lynch v. Dimaya, No. 15-1498 and the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. Begay, No. 14-10080. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/10/17. (KGM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores-Angeles v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Walter Perkel(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Abraham Flores-Angeles
Represented By:	Atmore L Baggot(Designation CJA Appointment)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?