Wilson v. Alvarez et al
Demetrius Antwan Wilson |
Jeffrey Alvarez, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, Maricopa Hospital and Integrated Health System, Margaret Mahoney, Unknown Party, SRT Team, Unknown Karas, Unknown Balaji, Unknown Sanchez and Matthew Barker |
2:2016cv02096 |
June 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Deborah M Fine (PS) |
James A Teilborg |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn only with respect to Plaintiff's "Notice of Change of Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine and Requesting She Be Removed," (Doc. 25 ), and that all other matt ers must remain with the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff's "Notice of Change of Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine and Requesting She Be Removed," (Doc. 25 ), seeks removal of Magistrate Judge Fine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, it is DENIED, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff's "Notice of Change of Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine and Requesting She Be Removed," (Doc. 25 ), seeks removal of Magistrate Judge Fine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, it is DENIED, without prejudice. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/28/16. (LAD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.